Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Three Tips for Developing Innovative Companies



Innovation is what makes the world grow and develop. In companies innovation can be worth a mountain of gold as a single innovative idea could turn a company ready to go bankrupt into a star performer. Just look at Apple and the development of innovative products that helped transform the company into a cash cow. To improve innovation in your company consider three different human capital areas of focus. 

There are a few good reasons why a company should develop innovation that includes stagnation through lack of new products and processes. Most companies will eventually move into a period of stagnation unless innovation is given appropriate weight. Companies must change the way they operate if they want to continue to grow. 

Innovation has many different factors that range from culture to compensation. However, it is sometimes beneficial to think of broad areas of improvement thereby leaving the details to the uniqueness of each company. At a minimum innovative implementation should consider teamwork, management, and employees as foundational aspects.

Teamwork: Ideas develop in a body of knowledge through social learning. Science requires the free exchange of ideas that allow new ideas and concepts to come to the forefront. In companies, teamwork allows people to share multiple vantage points and perspectives to come up with new and unique solutions. 

Having well balanced teams with different skill sets and diversity of people all focused on the same goal is important. Develop your teams wisely and ensure all members are working on the same problem. Let people free flow ideas and discuss them in an egalitarian manner until a final solution is found. 

Management: Managers are one of the most important factors in the success of a company. Hiring managers who are more interested in domination than performance is going to have serious consequences for innovative development. Few employees will bring forward ideas if they have been chastised in the past. 

The manager determines the types of interactions between those who can innovate and those who have the power to implement. Encouraging employees to come forward with new and well thought out ideas is beneficial. The manager should help inspire employees to develop and become more innovative. 

Employee: Innovative employees are a slightly different breed than many other types of employees. They are creative, risk takers, entrepreneurs, internally driven, theorists and thinkers. They take pleasure in finding new ways to think about ideas and concepts. 

Hiring employees that are constantly learning and giving unique responses to interview questions is important for innovation. Make sure that such employees are placed in positions where these skills are enhanced and toned for practical use is helpful. Like accounting, recruitment is a garbage-in and garbage-out approach where poor employees create poor companies. 

Innovation is a messy process and can be difficult to implement in an organization that is stuck in rigid methodologies and approaches. Rejuvenation requires the ability to find new ways of doing things that have a financial and cultural benefits on the organization. Creating higher levels of development requires thinking about the human capital of an organization and how it is used.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Call for Papers: Second 21st Century Academic Forum Conference at Harvard



Date: March 8-10, 2015

The theme of the Second 21st Century Academic Forum Conference at Harvard is Teaching, Learning, and Research in the "Just Google It" Age. We encourage submissions that approach this theme from a variety of perspectives under three major topic tracks: (1) teaching and learning in the 21st century and (2) creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship and (3) academic research for the 21st century. Please visit our website for detailed topic track lists.

Objective: The primary aim of the conference is to bring together an international group of researchers and practitioners to encourage and support the development of a new framework for better understanding the dynamic and interconnected nature of education, research, business, and life in the age of ubiquitous statement "just Google It."

Ways of Participating:

- Oral Presentation: 25 minutes
- Poster Presentation: 3 hours (held on March 9th from the a.m. coffee break through lunch)
- Absentee Presentation: For those who are unable to join us at Harvard, we offer you the opportunity to participate as an Absentee Presenter. Absentee Presenters can: upload their narrated PPT to our website, have their abstract printed in the Conference Program Book, and have their paper published in the Conference Proceedings
- Non-Presenter (Listener): For those interested in attending to participate in the various presentation sessions.

Paper Publication Opportunities:

All papers that meet the 21st Century Academic Forum's Conference Proceedings requirements will be published in our online Conference Proceedings (ISSN: 2330-1236). Papers must be submitted for inclusion in the Conference Proceedings by June 8, 2015. We purposely set the deadline for papers three months following the conference with the rationale that authors should use the feedback they receive at the conference in crafting their final drafts of their paper.

The Conference Proceedings will be published on September 7, 2015. The Conference Proceedings editorial board in turn works with the editors of our three peer-reviewed journals to select papers for possible publication in one of our three online peer-reviewed journals listed below.

- The International Journal of 21st Century Education (ISSN: 2330-1244)
- The International Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ISSN: 2333-9659)
- Journal of Language Learning and Teaching for the 21st Century (ISSN: 2333-9640)

Abstract Submission:

Submission of your abstract proposal(s) should be made in English through our Online Submission System until the final deadline of February 14, 2015. The Conference Committee reviews abstract proposals on a rolling basis and authors will typically receive a decision within two weeks of your submission.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Failure to Innovate in Higher Education- A Problem of Low Hanging Fruit



Education is a classical American institution that helps develop intellectual capital to encourage successful national growth. Sometimes institutions can work against their core purpose by failing to grow or develop beyond current limitations. Innovation in higher education is an important predictor of the success of both the higher education institution and the preparedness of a nation. Failure to reach beyond low hanging fruit in higher education causes stagnation and decline in the form of cost overruns and poor outcomes. 

Despite having strong support through state spending, family savings, and student loans the system has increasingly become unsustainable and hasn’t kept up with the life-long learning needs of working families. Throwing more resources into a clunky system that hasn’t changed only prolongs the eventual financial and educational reckoning that will occur if costs start to outstrip revenue. 

Online education has disrupted the assumptions of traditional education and provides a credible modality many government and higher education officials scoffed at just a decade ago. We can call this the process of innovation and implementation (Parker, 2012) whereby new technology creates chaos in the system and then becomes part of the mainstream until the next development occurs and the process starts all over. All developing industries rely on this innovation-implementation model for growth. 

Online education is a trend that reaches across for-profit and not-for-profit higher educational institutions. Students demand for flexibility in their studies should not be ignored. In 2010 enrollment in online courses increased 29% with 6.7 million (1/3 of all students) enrolled in online courses (Jaggars, et. al. 2013). A total of 97% of two-year colleges offer online courses while 66% of post-secondary universities also offer online courses. 

The far majority of schools in engage in online education and it is no longer a disruptive technology. It has grown because the market has demanded it grow. Online education may not offer the front page grabbing sports teams or large buildings that dotted the landscape in the 20th Century but does offer solutions for the 21st Century. This assumes that higher education is more about learning than maintaining tradition without consideration of long-term national costs. 

Experimentation in higher education is absolutely necessary to develop the institution to a higher level of existence. The quality of education is in a continuous process of change where new models influence traditional models by making them more efficient. In turn, innovative development is slowed and improved for mainstream consumption by traditional education stakeholders. There should be a balance of innovation and integration to ensure maximum relevancy of higher education institutions. Innovation and change avoids the need to reach for low hanging fruit that raises the cost and burden on society as a result of not considering long-term interests or risks.

Jaggars, S., Edgecombe, N. & Stacy, G. (2013). What we know about online course outcomes. Research Overview. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.  ED542143

Parker, S. (2012). Theories of entrepreneurship, innovation and the business cycle. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26 (3).


Friday, September 5, 2014

The U.S. Moves Up in Global Competitiveness but Still Needs Improvement to Claim #1 Spot


The U.S. is becoming more competitive according to the Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015. For two years in a row the U.S. has been improving and has moved into 3rd place with improvements in institutional framework, business sophistication, and innovation. The process of development is moving forward but lags behind due to perceptions of governmental efficiency and decision-making. As the nation aligns around core principles and values, it will better be able to foster the right pro-growth environment.

Strengths

The U.S. has strong infrastructure, flexible labor, advanced business, and a progressive use of new information. The report cites the willingness of businesses to work with universities to create innovation and development. This innovation turns into new products, services, and operations that strengthens the entire system. 

Weaknesses:  

The business community is skeptical of government, believe that government officials play favorites, and waste their tax resources. The macro environment continues to be weak and deficits have only started to move in the right direction. 

Innovation can occur on many different fonts ranging from the individual all the way up to government operations. It is a process of sharing knowledge and collaborating with mental and physical resources to build stronger frameworks of understanding for the development of marketable products and services. When businesses and entrepreneurs have strong virtual and physical networking opportunities matched with the right business environment they can create higher levels of innovative activities. 

Government still lags behind the needs of the business community and arguably its population. There are many tools and new developments that could make government stronger. The Internet affords opportunities to develop more responsive and cost effective services for people. Transparency, stronger data management, and responsive politicians to the needs of both the business community and the average citizen are desired to develop a pro-growth environment.