The sad state of affairs is that it has become increasingly dangerous to be in an official position in society where people are unlikely to be happy ( It use to be a problem for only some people but now is becoming a problem for more notable figures. Why I think its important to track back where they got these ideas, when they came up with the "bright" idea and whether they were communicating with others through social media, in person, etc.... We can't fully understand without thorough investigations.)
Whether we agree with specific choices and decisions we don't have the right to start targeting people. Just like I disagree with far left protesting outside judge's houses (Its not freedom of speech its leans toward intimidation. You can protest outside the courts, businesses, in the street. Homes are more sacred and it only takes one radical to cause problems.) I also disagree with far right extremist views that think Americans only look like them (...and the propensity toward coordinated armed violence).
The problem is we can't really get our politicians to zip their lips because they want something and have not learned a healthy respect for their positions, democracy, and the need for strong institutions (When leadership on both sides begins to default we begin to eat ourselves from the inside. Let us watch the trend and encourage our leadership to start working together and change the nature of discourse Conflict Modeling, Cognitive Team, Social Projection, Moral Character, Feedback Loop, Greatest Threats, Outperforming ). They also don't always know that their escalating words and encampment justify the unjustifiable in the sick and diseased mind.
We see these extremism behaviors grow in our home towns, nation's capital, and against our institutions. As long as the fundamental of values don't change we will continue to experience these behaviors.(Leaders ability to work together in a bi-partisan way to solve national problems. If these trends continue they will be forced to make compromises as trust and popularity ratings will plummet. I agree that if you are not capable of compromise you really shouldn't be in leading positions. There is a different between compromising values and compromising on methods.)
Despite the growing trend few want to compromise and some don't want to solve problems (Think differently in one party or the other and you are thrown out. Its not what it was supposed to be. Big money supplanting the voice of reason and the needs of people.).
Encampment creates problems for the rest of us. We need more centralists that are willing to stand on principle and have a backbone on basic values. We need our leaders to be rationalists beyond Republican and Democrat. They have to refocus on loftier goals.
After my family and I were targeted by those bent on supporting their social networks in hate (Whether personal, religious, or racial makes no difference.) I learned the importance of better laws that ensure those displaying aggression and irrational behaviors have mandatory mental health (It helps keep them out of trouble and helps keep others safe. It can also be an alternative to jail of caught early enough.). We need a system that requires such mandatory counseling as a method of pre-empting other such issues such as this. 🤔
Always so negative. So let us think of some positive things. Our politicians are starting to compromise on things like guns and have done so on infrastructure. While some are pulling further left and right there is the start of a sociological middle. There is great pressure on them to bend their values but I believe they will grow by necessity and in turn will pick up momentum. That may lead to better decision making by breaking the grid lock but will also push some further left or right. Time will tell. Nothing is forever sure. At least from a sociological perspective.
Armed man arrested near Brett Kavanaugh’s home charged with attempting to murder a US judge
No comments:
Post a Comment