The official Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) information will be released later. What can be said is that there is no evidence (leaving the possibility) of IT being alien. It certainly can't be ruled out because we have evidence of simple bacterial life on other planets (meaning we don't know what we don't know!). Intelligence indicates it could be a rival nation (or elite group) that has developed these technologies (i.e. if the same sightings have been around in similar form for 20 years we would have likely already seen some economic adaptations as the knowledge would have been commercialized. We also can't rule out that a secret science group would not have the same motivations to fully commercialize discoveries; depending on funding sources. There have been some energy attacks at various embassies and other locations so we can't rule out that they are related and drawn from similar technology lines).
I think we can build this thing! Need more power strength retention/draw on battery and solar but we might also charge panels to move particles to and away from a ship/vessel/UAP. Once you can switch charges on the surface of a ship you have very fast propulsion (maybe). Think of an advance version of static electricity. It might allow for propulsion under water and in air through push and/or pull streaming mechanisms. See Scientific American Bend Water.
Open questions are like risks and represent the big unknowns. While they appear to be peaceful we don't understand the technology, have nothing to meet/defend against it (at least what we state officially), and have very little direction on how to deal with it. I say study and build it!
This is how I would Approach This Issue (Very generic and does no justice to the actual detailed process):
1. Collect all evidence.
2. Review, code/categorize, scrub evidence, and analyze data. Have there been changes in the technology over 20 years?
3. Review leading theories and cross compare them for similarities and how well they fit with the evidence (Theory buckets).
4. Where I have open gaps I would set up better surveillance (Law of universe says if you surveille us we can surveille back without it causing a problem.). Perhaps we need to review other patterns and behaviors and get one of them into a high powered photo/radar bomb (A little like what teenagers do on Instagram but with much better cameras.))
5. Come to a leading theory and adjust every time there is new information to support or change the theory buckets.
6. Start finding start-ups, investors, and scientists who can build these things (See Delta County Innovation Model, DC Forming New Industries, Red Queen Adaptations ...sorry the Red Queen one is sort of funny but is also sort of true. 🤣We often shun human diversity in thought, body and activity but we must rely on that same diversity to solve problems and advance to meet whatever challenges lay before. Think of how we leave gifted kids with no resources but dump that money into other activities that might not have the same outputs. It won't be long before we reach planets commercially as oxygen creation technology and solar propulsion advance. Maybe sooner with commercial space flight developing fast through govt-industry development. 🤷 The point being, our brains are likely to start adapting in the Digital Era/Information Age to make sense of lots of information and be able to formulate increasingly abstract and complex ideas. The transition might be hard for some if their primary concern is wonder whether their new clothes help them socially peacock to the same group of friends they have known for 40 years. Just saying! 😏).
The following is quoted from National Security Agency Central Security Service (NSACSS). You can also find declassified but highly redacted UFO documents. They are the older ones. See Older UFO Declass
The documents listed on this page were located in response to the numerous requests received by NSA on the subject of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO). In 1980, NSA was involved in Civil Action No. 80-1562, "Citizens Against Unidentified Flying Objects Secrecy v. National Security Agency". Documents related to that litigation are marked with "*". "XXXXX" has been inserted in a title if a portion of the title has been deleted prior to release. To select a document click on the document title, and wait for the PDF version to be downloaded to your local viewer. Approximate file sizes are given after each selection for user convenience."(NSACSS)
No comments:
Post a Comment